On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 02:42:23PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > sent from a phone > > > Am 24.06.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Florian Lohoff <f...@zz.de>: > > > > motorway_link is not a different highway type - Its some attribute which > > slipped into the highway type. > > I don't agree. It might work to treat these like motorways with a link > attribute, but they seem at least to be much more different from a > motorway than a secondary from a primary road. In the end: what is a > highway type?
From a legal perspective they are not something different ;) Motorway
might be something special - But tertiary_link, primary_link,
secondary_link are not special.
In the dark ages of OSM somebody overloaded the highway type with
attribution.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de
We need to self-defense - GnuPG/PGP enable your email today!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
