On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 10:23:44AM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > sent from a phone > > > Am 07.08.2015 um 00:38 schrieb Dave F. <dave...@madasafish.com>: > > > > For some tag developments i can see the benefits, but I'm struggling with > > this one I'm afraid. > > > +1 > while in the addr:-namespace all keys are actually address components, this > can be contested for the contact: namespace. A website for instance is not > primarily a means of contact, sometimes it might not be suitable at all for > contact purposes, but still there are generally good reasons to add website > tags (further information and context).
that is the exact point explaining why there is a need for contact:website. A website= is generally not a contact page but the homepage. Otoh contact:website= should contain a specific page for conatct, be it a contact form or perhaps a page listing all phone numbers. The number of comunication apps is steadilly on the rise, many companies advertise contact:skype and similar - any data consumer that knows "contact:" can find and display those without even knowing they exist. Richard _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
