On 06.10.2015 10:45, Simon Poole wrote: > Your Anrainer vs. Anrainerverkehr example for AT doesn't seem to be any > different than the Anwohner/Anlieger difference in DE, which > semantically for routing purposes boils down to private/destination > (which I suspect most routers wouldn't actually differentiate in any case).
It's *not* destination, see my other posts. To put it more clearly: "destination" targets a location, while Anrainerverkehr targets people. You can also see it like this: "destination" is about where you go, while Anrainerverkehr is about what you wanna do there. -- Friedrich K. Volkmann http://www.volki.at/ Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging