> If I don't know something .. I don't tag it. > So I would simply not add the tag.
This is the right answer. +1 Agreed. Why would you add a tag when you don't know a value to assign? N In addition, concerning the signed:opening_hours=yes/no, there is no need to assign more tags to describe a lack of information about the first one. On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Craig Wallace <craig...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > On 2015-10-10 20:28, Michał Brzozowski wrote: > >> In the course of surveys, I fill in opening_hours of shops and other >> venues. Sometimes though, they are not marked outside. Therefore, when >> looking at a feature that lacks opening_hours other mappers and I >> can't tell the reason. I've been thinking of a standardized way of >> marking such cases, like: >> opening_hours:status=unmarked >> which is to be understood that mapper didn't see opening hours >> displayed outside (but other sources may be available). >> This would benefit survey planning. A mapper will know to come at >> standard business hours to ask staff and that it can take slightly >> more time to survey. >> > > Maybe use a tag for "signed"? ie signed:opening_hours=no if they are not > displayed. Or signed:opening_hours=yes if you want to specify that they are > actually visible (that could be the default). > As it is a simple boolean value, it can easily be added with a checkbox in > the editor. > > This sort of tag can be used for other attributes, ie signed:name, > signed:ref, signed:name:fr etc. There already is some use of these tags (or > the variations name:signed etc). > > Craig > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
