On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 6:20 AM, Steve Doerr <doerr.step...@gmail.com> wrote:
> UN convention, apparently: > > > <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2011-September/008578.html> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2011-September/008578.html > Well, this would qualify a decent number of bike lanes, then, particularly in Oregon where the minimum lane width in most cases is 2m wide, which will fit a decent number of motor vehicles. But even then, I'm not sure the UN convention necessarily needs to set the bar in this case compared to practical application, particularly when the convention predates most on-street bicycle facilities by a large margin.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
