On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Lauri Kytömaa <lkyto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:priority > > > > Would there be any major objection to expanding the priority key to > include > > two way, multilane situations? Example would be a two way street that > was > > formerly a one-way street, and has signal timings as if it were a one-way > > street (thus the green wave turns into the red crawl if you're going the > > direction opposite the de-facto priority). > > I'd rather keep that key solely for cases of "legal" priority of one > direction > on the road segment in question. Both might effectively slow you down, but > in the "legal" case driving there is a different from "just slow" red > light crawl. > > There have been some proposals in the past in the wiki for various > approaches to recording the fact that the delays are higher than could > be normally expected, but I'm not aware of any of them ever having > gained any support. OK, I wonder if anybody's got a strategy for dealing with this situation then.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
