On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 15:00:37 +0100 Marc Zoutendijk <marczoutend...@mac.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > One of the rules we use is the "one feature, one OSM element” [1] > This makes sense for a lot of elements, e.g. if something has the > tag: higway=residential it would be silly to also have > amenity=restaurant on the same element. But it is not very uncommon > to have a memorial that was created as a piece of art by an artist. > One could tag such an object with: > > tourism=artwork > historic=memorial > > and of course add other relevant stuff like artist_name etc. > > But what should be rendered in such a case? The memorial or the > artwork? It depends solely on needs of data consumer - it is not a tagging problem. > Validators often complain in such situations That is a clear bug in validator - it should be reported to the maintainer. > while humanly speaking > there is nothing wrong with it.There are numeorus artists who have > created memorial statues or pieces of art. > > What is your solution for this problem? Tagging is OK and needs no change. And bugs/tuning/improving of specific data consumers is rather offtopic here. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
