sent from a phone
> Am 27.03.2016 um 11:47 schrieb Colin Smale <colin.sm...@xs4all.nl>: > > In the UK the word "country" is also used in that context, for example > "Shakespeare Country", "White Cliffs Country", "Black Country". > > I would suggest a relation with type=boundary and boundary=informal, plus an > indication of the accuracy/authority of the border like source=guesswork, or > signs, or local authority brochures, ...... > I agree that a rough polygon seems better than a node because it allows to estimate the size (a new relation datatype would even be better, like a collection of (existing/already mapped) things inside (role) and outside (role) that would serve the same purpose but make it clear that it is only an estimate / that there aren't clear borders anyway). I don't like boundary=informal though. It should be something more verbose regarding what kind of region this is (natural/geographic, (low) mountain range, area of lakes, forest, desert, plains, cultural, ethnographic, wine, etc.) cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
