but then you should clearly explain why 5 "complex" tags for a driving school is better than 1. And in case you do not really need them all five, the proposal should better indicate the required tags for a driving school and the optional ones. I think "education_system:de_standard=yes", "education_form:parttime=yes" and "education_program:driving_licence:eu_b=yes" are optional. This would simplify the tagging dramatically, not ?
I see a lot of similarity with healthcare 2.0, similar possibilities, similar complexity, and ... similar adoption rate ?? regards m On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Александр Шишкин <kederm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, I (or anyone else) can not just force mappers to use or not to use > certain tags. Only way to deal with it is to give them better way to tag > things. That's what this proposal is about. > > 2016-04-14 10:06 GMT+03:00 Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com>: >> >> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Шишкин Александр (Shishkin Ale >> <kederm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I assume that tags related to education that have been approved and do >> > not >> > have "education" key should remain (not sure what to do with unapproved >> > tags). >> >> I cannot advise on that. Not everybody is giving the same weight to >> the approval process. A usage of 7681 for amenity=driving school is >> not something that can be neglected IMHO, even when it's not approved >> (given they were not all imported by 1 person). >> >> m. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
