sent from a phone
> Il giorno 23 ago 2016, alle ore 14:02, Bjoern Hassler <bjohas...@gmail.com> > ha scritto: > > Strictly speaking, bing may not have been the source, as the data may come > from a ground survey. But would it be reasonable to add "source=bing" if the > structure is visible on bing? I suppose "verified:bing2012" may be clearer, > and avoid confusion? any ground survey is much more reliable than an assessment from remote, that's why I would put survey in the source tag when I did perform a survey. Maybe I just don't get the point why you would add bing tags for a site where you have been to. What is the scope? cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging