sent from a phone

> Il giorno 23 ago 2016, alle ore 14:02, Bjoern Hassler <bjohas...@gmail.com> 
> ha scritto:
> 
> Strictly speaking, bing may not have been the source, as the data may come 
> from a ground survey. But would it be reasonable to add "source=bing" if the 
> structure is visible on bing? I suppose "verified:bing2012" may be clearer, 
> and avoid confusion?


any ground survey is much more reliable than an assessment from remote, that's 
why I would put survey in the source tag when I did perform a survey. Maybe I 
just don't get the point why you would add bing tags for a site where you have 
been to. What is the scope?


cheers,
Martin 
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to