This is the aerial imagery of the area the original poster is talking about:
https://binged.it/2kN1tfC
To all intents it could be a park.
In osm it's at:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370388062#map=17/-38.15997/145.20073
Cheers
Ross
On 08/02/17 19:51, Dave Swarthout wrote:
Yes, I see now you're asking about the land that the pipeline either
runs over or through.
I would avoid the term reserve, however. I generally think of a
reserve as a larger area, often a park or historic area, e.g., the
Gabo Island Lighthouse Reserve in Canada or the Hinchinbrook
Lighthouse Reserve, which is a Park in Valdez-Cordova County, Alaska.
There is also this reserve which is related to your illustration; the
huge area known as the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska, but I
would not want it to be confused with your tagging targets.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Petroleum_Reserve%E2%80%93Alaska
Maybe landuse=pipeline would be a good pick?
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com
<mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 08-Feb-17 06:51 PM, François Lacombe wrote:
Hi Warin,
Do you have pictures of such areas plz ?
I don't see anything corresponding to 'reserve'
All the best
Not personally ... and it is a fair way away. As I say .. reported
on the Australian group.
I assume there is a sign locally to advise on the 'pipeline
reserve'.
Gas pipe lines cover fair distances in Australia ..
One line is 1,300 km here
https://www.apa.com.au/our-services/gas-transmission/east-coast-grid/moomba-sydney-pipeline/
<https://www.apa.com.au/our-services/gas-transmission/east-coast-grid/moomba-sydney-pipeline/>
The reserve might be up to 25 meters wide from
https://www.seagas.com.au/safety/ <https://www.seagas.com.au/safety/>
Photo of their warning sign
http://www.seagas.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/danger.jpg
<http://www.seagas.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/danger.jpg>
I have seen similar signs for gas and fibre optic lines in my
wanderings, some warning of a restriction in use of area above the
line - thus advising of a restrictive reserve.
There will be local storm water, potable water lines too.
Long distant buried communication lines too, a number over 8,500
km. At least some of these will have 'reserves' evident on the
surface.
Le 8 févr. 2017 08:24, "Warin" <61sundow...@gmail.com
<mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
That tags the pipe line itself.
The request is to tag the area set aside for a pipe line ...
a reserve.
On 08-Feb-17 04:38 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote:
There is already a tagging structure for pipelines that
takes into account whether it's underground or overground. See
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8964252
<http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8964252>
for a section of the Trans Alaska Pipeline. However, the
land area above the pipeline, which is restricted for casual
access throughout Alaska, has no special tagging.
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com
<mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
A question came up on the Australian list that would be
more appropriate here.
"My local area (and I'm sure many others) have lots of
pipeline reserves.
I'm really not sure how to tag these. They appear to have
public access for walking at least. (One local one has a
sign
disallowing golf...) Some others appear to be across private
land, and i'm less interested in those, I'd really like to
show those ones with public access.
examples:http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370388062#map=17/-38.15997/145.20073
<http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370388062#map=17/-38.15997/145.20073>
I've tagged them as leisure=park previously, and paths
evident on the ground have just been tagged
highway=path.
Any ideas?"
My comments:
I note the pipeline is not visible ... I assume
underground and the
location is not evident so you cannot map the pipe line
itself.
As it is a landuse ... ?
I would tag landuse=pipeline
However ... some pipe lines cross farms, residential
areas ... these have legal easements through the
associated properties.
And these would be already tagged with a landuse.
Humm power lines are mapped ... should there be similar
provision for other infrastructure?
Perhaps a 'infrastructure' tag that can be used for all?
infrastructure=pipeline
infrastructure=sewer
infrastructure=water
infrastructure=phone
Note it should be used for the area that is affected
by/reserved for the infrastructure, not just the
infrastructure itself?
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
<https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
--
Dave Swarthout
Homer, Alaska
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
<https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
_______________________________________________ Tagging
mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org
<mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
<https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
<https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing
list Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
<https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
--
Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at
http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
