No, this is actually closer to indoor farming. Shelves hold the plants which are fed nutrients hydroponically, and these shelves may be stacked one atop the other. Hence the term "vertical gardening". Everything is controlled artificially, even the content of the atmosphere.
And it does not take place in a greenhouse because the light cycle must be carefully controlled to produce flowers; sunlight is not required and, in fact, it is not desirable. That is one major reason these facilities are indoor. Although the produce is natural, the process to grow marijuana at latitudes not near the equator is emphatically not. On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com > wrote: > > 2017-03-15 11:32 GMT+01:00 Thilo Haug OSM <th...@gmx.de>: > >> Hello all, >> >> regarding vertical plants, >> some examples against air pollution came to my mind. >> it's not really "farming", but at least an "artificial" way to grow >> plants, >> so it doesn't really fit with "natural" http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/ >> wiki/Key:natural >> >> Do you think this should be considered ? >> > > > are you referring to facades or walls with plants growing on them? I think > there might be a suggestion in the detailed building tags (some extension > referring to facades), but I don't recall which. > Definitely this is not something for "natural" (which are mostly natural > geografic features and some landcover mixed in), see also the landcover > proposal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/landcover > > Cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
