Though I came lately here, I agree. Indicating the type of industrial area will help indicate the industry where the piece of land is used.
--TagaSanPedroAko On Jul 4, 2017 6:08 PM, "Martin Koppenhoefer" <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2017-07-04 1:56 GMT+02:00 John Willis <jo...@mac.com>: > >> it seems like other long-term infrastructure (power towers, communication >> towers) are suggested to be landuse=industrial. >> >> I really think there should be some kind of subtag then, because not only >> can you define what and why you are tagging, but it allows presets to be >> easily created in iD and searched by new taggers. >> >> industrial=power, industrial=communication, etc. >> > > > I agree that a formalization of industrial subtags would be really > desirable. There are many different kind of things that get this same > landuse property, e.g. warehouses, production facilities, logistical > infrastructure (ports, distribution centres, ...). > > For the German context (but likely also for other places), there should be > also a distinction for "light industry" (Gewerbe). > > Then it seems strange we don't have yet a standardized list of typical top > level categories (e.g. automotive, textile, semiconductors, electronics, > energy, machinery, mining, ...) > > Cheers, > Martin > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
