On 16.09.2017 00:56, Tom Pfeifer wrote: > IMHO these are not means of contact, instead these are review websites. > While I personally think that we do not need them in OSM at all, they > certainly do not belong in the contact:* namespace.
I agree that these aren't contact channels, and it makes no sense to put them into that namespace. Regarding your second point, I'm also not a big fan of having these in OSM at all. I appreciate links to open content sites (Wikipedia, Wikidata and so on), as well as the official website of an entity. But advertising non-open third-party sites – and inevitably favouring them over their competitors – doesn't feel right. This group of keys also seems to be a favourite of SEO spammers and their ilk. Tobias _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging