Seeing your comments on the Talkpage, I agree about the difficulty of
classifying all the cases clearly into whether route=bus or route=coach.
Now, I've looked again at the Oxomoa scheme proposal which already
suggested an idea to differentiate between different bus route types by
using the key "bus". Are there any arguments against this approach? We
should only discuss possible values such as long_distance or intercity,
suburban, urban, school, shuttle, express, train_replacement etc.
Comments are very welcome on
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Public_Transport_v2_Vehicle_Type_%22coach%22
Greets!
El 04/10/17 a las 03:02, Colin Smale escribió:
Hi,
I have commented on the Talk page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Public_Transport_v2_Vehicle_Type_%22coach%22
In summary, I am not in favour of this proposal as it stands, as it is
insufficiently distinct from the existing bus stuff.
--colin
On 2017-10-04 05:36, Mikolai-Alexander Gütschow wrote:
Hi all,
I've elaborated a proposal for the route=coach tag according to the
Public Transport Scheme v2 and as already in use in some cases.
See
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Public_Transport_v2_Vehicle_Type_%22coach%22
The proposal adds the possibility to differentiate between city bus
and coach routes.
Please comment!
Ialokim
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
