> Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 11:14:56 +0000 > From: marc marc <marc_marc_...@hotmail.com> > To: "tagging@openstreetmap.org" <tagging@openstreetmap.org> > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Fire Hydrant > Extensions) > > Hello, > > Le 05. 10. 17 à 12:16, Viking a écrit : > > I really don't understand why so many people oppose this proposal [1] > > without ever having participated in the discussions > it is indeed strange that no opponent took the time to say during the RFC > arguments > that are found now during the vote. > > yes the wiki page need a cleaning between the basic tags and the advanced > tags. is it > the role of a tag vote to talk about the layout of the wiki page or should we > talk > about tag changes ? > imho wiki layout doesn't need a vote, it only need to follow tag meaning > > yes the proposal will change many objects but changing 1k objects or 100k it > is the > same work when updating an app. > > yes it will need a transition period for the few specialized apps to be > updated but it is > not by splitting the proposal tag by tag that it will be better, on the > contrary devs will > have to do x release instead of being able to group them. > > There are also hardly understandable arguments as opposed to the replacement > of > fire_hydrant:position by location since they have the same meaning. > > ihmo removing the namespace when it is useless and the proposed additional > (and > optional) tags are a heavy but coherent and positive set > > Regardless of the outcome of the ongoing vote, I would like to take this > opportunity > to thank you for the time you have devoted to it and for the constructive > spirit in the > search for a concessus. > > I hope that this energy will persist if the current proposal fails due to > "voting-only" > people. > > Regards, > Marc
I echo Marc's sentiment! Mark _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
