> check_date tag is very imprecise. some use it to indicate when they checked > the object on the ground without knowing what was checked. > others use it to check the date of objects under construction in external > sources without verification of the ground. > I had proposed that we use operational_status:date which has the merit of > making it clear that we are want to have the functional test. But this tag is > not specific to hydrants, I'm not sure it should be added in the proposal of > hydrants. > I wrote to the author of the proposal operational_status but I did not get an > answer. I will ask again and if it does not answer, I will propose to take > over the proposal separately from the hydrants. >What do you think about ?
Ok, let us know about it. > another think : imho we should remove name as "usefull combination". +1 I do it, it is a residual of original wiki page. > also we should remove fire_hydrant:count=* as "usefull combination" +1 I do it, it is a residual of original wiki page. Best regards Alberto --- Questa e-mail è stata controllata per individuare virus con Avast antivirus. https://www.avast.com/antivirus _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
