This will need a whole proposal to get a comprehensive description for pumps. I think we should only use pump=yes for now and wait for a more complete document to be written.
I agree with Colin, this is a vast question and it takes time to think about right tags to use. François *François Lacombe* fl dot infosreseaux At gmail dot com www.infos-reseaux.com @InfosReseaux <http://www.twitter.com/InfosReseaux> 2017-12-19 17:52 GMT+01:00 Colin Smale <colin.sm...@xs4all.nl>: > Hi Moritz, > > It depends on what characteristics are important to you. > > "water driven" is power transfer medium so pump:power_medium=water. This > is not the energy source! It doesn't say if the water has potential/kinetic > energy due to gravity, or if it itself is being pressurised by a powered > pump (e.g. hydrostatic drive) > > "integrated" is to distinguish from something else? What would be > alternatives to a pump being "integrated"? > > "bilge pump" is about its function, so something like "pump:function=bilge" > > "in a well" is about its location so "pump:location=bottom_of_well"? > > > How about the type of pump? Centrifugal? Reciprocating? > > And the medium that is being pumped? In this context it is probably water > but in general a pump could be used for all sorts of stuff. > > --colin > > On 2017-12-19 17:31, Moritz wrote: > > Hi Colin, > > Am 2017-12-19 16:29, schrieb Colin Smale: > > Please don't use "pump:type" as it invites people to use it for loads of > different things. You are actually doing it yourself. A "bilge pump" is > functional and says nothing about the construction or power source (even > if there is such a thing as a typical bilge pump). And "electric_pump" > is about the power source, and says nothing about the function or > construction. > > > What is your suggestion for proper tagging a > > * water driven bilge pump which is integrated in the well > * an electric pump integrated in the well? > > Moritz > > > On 2017-12-19 16:20, François Lacombe wrote: > > Hi Viking, > > Thank you for your work on this additional part > > I'd be in favor of grouping pump et pump:type in on "pump" key. Valid > values would be yes, bilge_pump or electric_pum. Yes would be used only if > pump technology is unknown. > > There is no need of 2 keys. > > All the best > > François > > FRANÇOIS LACOMBE > > fl dot infosreseaux At gmail dot com > www.infos-reseaux.com [3 <http://www.infos-reseaux.com>] > @InfosReseaux [4 <http://www.twitter.com/InfosReseaux>] > 2017-12-19 10:40 GMT+01:00 Viking <vikin...@tin.it>: > > I removed all "useful combination" on hydrants wiki, because all optional > tags could be added to this list and it would become unnecessarily long. > > Best regards > Alberto > > --- > Questa e-mail è stata controllata per individuare virus con Avast > antivirus. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus [1 <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>] > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging [2 > <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>] > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > > Links: > ------ > [1] https://www.avast.com/antivirus > [2] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > [3] http://www.infos-reseaux.com > [4] http://www.twitter.com/InfosReseaux > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
