On 10 January 2018 at 10:21, Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> wrote: > Seems we are repeating ourselves once again: > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2012-July/010809.html > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2014-November/019998.html
In order to avoid repeating ourselves again in a year: should I add a note to the wiki page of `amenity=drinking_water` that this tag is discouraged? Or is this something that needs to be voted on given the fact that this is an approved tag and is widely used? On 10 January 2018 at 10:21, Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> wrote: > Seems we are repeating ourselves once again: > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2012-July/010809.html > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2014-November/019998.html > > regards > > m > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 9:53 AM, Thibaud B <cbgb-...@hotmail.fr> wrote: >>>Because drinking water is a *property* of sources, water wells, >>>fountains, drinking fountains (bubblers) etc., I think it makes more >>>sense to tag these objects and to add drinking_water=yes tags >>>(discouraging the use of `amenity=drinking_water`). >> >>>As for the rendering, I like how OsmAnd renders drinking_water=yes/no: >>>with a drop overlay that is blue for drinking_water=yes [^1] and grey >>>for drinking_water=no [^2]. >> >> >> Yes in order to have a clear pattern for tagging these "water delivering" >> items, we need to separate the physical aspect from the quality of water >> provided. >> >> Physical aspect would be : water_wells, drinking_foutains --> good for the >> user to know if he can easily drink or fill a bottle or connect a hose etc.. >> >> Quality of water would be : drinking_water=yes/no; mineral_water=yes/no >> >> ________________________________ >> De : Selfish Seahorse <selfishseaho...@gmail.com> >> Envoyé : mercredi 10 janvier 2018 09:38:00 >> À : Tag discussion, strategy and related tools >> Objet : Re: [Tagging] Water source types >> >> On 10 January 2018 at 01:49, Daniel Koć <daniel@koć.pl> wrote: >>> I would say that amenity=drinking_water is a general source of the high >>> quality water and it would be good to make it more specific if possible - >>> adding tap, well and pump tags would be nice. >> >> Because drinking water is a *property* of sources, water wells, >> fountains, drinking fountains (bubblers) etc., I think it makes more >> sense to tag these objects and to add drinking_water=yes tags >> (discouraging the use of `amenity=drinking_water`). >> >> As for the rendering, I like how OsmAnd renders drinking_water=yes/no: >> with a drop overlay that is blue for drinking_water=yes [^1] and grey >> for drinking_water=no [^2]. >> >> [^1]: >> https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd-resources/blob/master/icons/svg/overlays/drinking_water_yes.svg >> [^2]: >> https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd-resources/blob/master/icons/svg/overlays/drinking_water_no.svg >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
