> On Apr 10, 2018, at 11:09 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> they are. A flowerbed is about something human made. What you have been 
> posting is a forest

+1 

There are many natural spectacles (the fall colors on the mountains, certian 
flowers that grow on wild hills, etc) that is a form of attraction, but is 
neither a subset of garden nor a flowerbed. 

Just like a fountain in a park and a waterfall in the wilderness. 

Just to muddy the waters, several places I take pictures of flowers "in the 
wilderness" are transplanted and cultivated by the locals. Some of the flowers 
are native to other regions, and transplanted to similar climates to recreate 
the natural spectacle, and to diversify the locations (in case a volcano 
explodes and kills all the others in one spot). They care for the plants and 
increase their density to keep the (moneymaking) attraction. But these are 
pretty rare compared the flower spectacles I am talking about. 

There was an eruption on Mt Kusatsu-Shirane a few months ago; it was 400m from 
some mountain flowers they painstakingly transplanted a couple decades prior. I 
hope they all lived. 
https://www.flickr.com/photos/javbw/11094084766/

Javbw. 



_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to