But we're not talking about either farmland or a crop in this case. The
flowers (or flowerbed, if you prefer) I'm talking about is actually a
tourist attraction and is maintained for that purpose.

On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 6:38 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> 2018-04-09 13:08 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@gmail.com>:
>
>> On Mon, 09 Apr 2018 01:50:50 +0000
>> Dave Swarthout <daveswarth...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > How about
>> > tourism=attraction
>> > attraction=flowers
>>
>> I think that man_made=flowerbed + tourism=attraction would be
>> preferable, it would allow tagging also flower fields that are not a
>> tourism attraction at all.
>>
>>
>
> +1, I would also prefer not creating a category for attractions which
> would then be defined as what they are by subtags, because everything can
> happen to be an attraction and it would ultimately lead to double tagging
> everything, an attraction version and not.
>
> For the flower field, maybe landuse=farmland with crop=* could also be an
> option?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>



-- 
Dave Swarthout
Homer, Alaska
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to