If it is not landuse=flower_bed,what is the landuse tag then ? The land is used for something, not ? So even when you tag it as landcover (or man_made) = flower_bed, I would still expect to be able to add a landuse tag as well.
m. On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 12:04 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/04/18 19:30, John Willis wrote: >> >> Actual flower Farms are landuse=farmland crop=flowers. Yea, they may have >> a viewpoint and a gift shop. But those large commercial farms are not what >> I'm talking about. >> >> These are about tagging the actual beds of decorative flowers with >> landuse=flowerbed (which I think is totally a landuse - it is land dedicated >> to flowers for display or decoration), > > > -1 ... it is not a 'landuse'. > The same can be done by other things than flower beds ... lilies on a pond, > topiary for example. > It is not defined by 'flowerbed! > > It is a land cover ... > >> and tagging gardens that are "flower spectacles" - places that grow >> flowers primarily as a spectacle (and often charge admission) using a >> garden:type=foobar is the two tags I am asking for feedback on. >> Landuse=grass is crappy - is it for sports? picnicing? Roadside shoulder? >> Landscaping? > > > A flower bed can be for obtaining cut flowers in a residential garden. The > land use is still residential, not flowerbed. > > A flowerbed can be in the middle of a roundabout, the landuse is still > highway. > > The land cover in both the above is a flowerbed. > > >> >> Luckily flowers in a non-farm sense serve a single purpose - to be looked >> at. They are colorful decorations. You don't sleep on them. You don't play >> sports on them. People grow flowers in dedicated land merely to be enjoyed. > > > Or to cut up and placed inside for decoration and smell. > >> >> ~~~~ >> >> Several places around the world grow tulips and build a Dutch windmill to >> emulate a working landuse=farmland - but just as Space Mountain is neither a >> spaceship nor an actual mountain, these are tourist attractions made to >> emulate the look of a farm for people looking to take pictures. These fall >> into the category of "flower attractions" and I want to tag these as such. > > > Tourist attractions. Land cover = flowerbed. > >> >> When I lived in San diego, the only thing I had ever seen like this is the >> Carlsbad flower fields. There are formal botanical gardens and rose gardens >> - but a town or large commercial park just doesn't purposefully grow very >> large fields of flowers in a large field and put out a viewing platform like >> they do in Japan *and* get hundreds, thousands, or tens of thousands of >> people a week that come to just merely view the spectacle that they >> purposefully made, year after year in the same spot and static >> configuration. >> >> Maybe it is common in the rest of the world, but these flower spectacles >> (and their dedicated area just for flowers) seems something that needs >> precise tagging. >> >> Javbw >> >>> On Apr 10, 2018, at 2:19 PM, Clifford Snow <cliff...@snowandsnow.us> >>> wrote: >>> >>> In John Wills original post he talked about tulip farms. T >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
