For your first image lanes=0, lanes:forward=2, lanes:backward=1. Awkward but correct. But as said before, the lanes tag is pretty useless beside some simple, straightforward street layouts, for even number of total lanes evenly divided in both directions. Lanes=3 is useless, not?
So once again, define a new tag or do not use the lanes tag, or use it as it is defined now. Do not change its meaning. Op za 12 mei 2018 23:16 schreef Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org>: > On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Why do you keep taggig roads if you know the wiki tells you not to >> count cycle lanes? > > > The wiki doesn't mesh with the real world on this issue. > > How is this lanes=0 and not lanes=2? > > https://imgur.com/gallery/3C3lHbj > > How is this lanes=2 and not lanes=4? > > > http://www.oregonlive.com/cycling/index.ssf/2013/10/hawthorne_bridge_gets_new_bike.html > > What now? > > > https://nacto.org/wp-content/uploads/gallery/bicycleboulevard_offsetcrossing_rendering/offset_crossings3.jpg > > I'm sure this fits the wiki's idea of the world and doesn't give cyclists > bad lane advice at all. > > > https://i.pinimg.com/originals/a3/76/c2/a376c2693250554476060fc87b00be9f.jpg > > All involved would probably appreciate advanced warning of this example of > what's on the ground being stupid. > > > https://systemicfailure.wordpress.com/2016/09/28/dangerous-double-right-turn-in-fremont/ > > It's not just the US doing stuff like this. > > https://tinlizzieridesagain.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/100_8603.jpg > > Christchurch, NZ actually suggests this: > > > http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-SPHHygdFnRA/UwCbqrLXfoI/AAAAAAAARMA/yPT4ic1zTqw/s1600/christchurchmadjunction.jpg > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
