So you would need a commitment from the tagger side not to do that, because it would invalidate the experiment. Maybe a provision can be made for cautious transitional measures if the experiment results in a go? Then all projects are aware and there is no need for undiscussed mechanical edits.
2018-06-08 10:36 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com>: > 8. Jun 2018 10:33 by pelder...@gmail.com: > > In this case, if there was a commitment from the renderer side, say to > plan the rendering of landcover=trees and landcover=grass if the use of the > key rises above [N] by [deadline], I think that would give taggers the > choice they now don't have. > > > The problem is that it would strongly encourage undiscussed mechanical > edits. > > > DWG has already massive queue of damaging edits without encouraging > additional ones. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > -- Vr gr Peter Elderson
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
