From: Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, 18 June 2018 17:35 To: tagging@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Tagging] emergency=lifeguard
On 18/06/18 16:24, osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au <mailto:osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au> wrote: From: Graeme Fitzpatrick <mailto:graemefi...@gmail.com> <graemefi...@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, 18 June 2018 16:01 To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org> <tagging@openstreetmap.org> Subject: Re: [Tagging] emergency=lifeguard while some show a shape in one image, but other's, possibly during the northern winter, show an empty deserted beach. I would consider lifeguard=place to be still acceptable for these if there is some defined time when a lifeguard is present. Maybe specified with a seasonal tag or opening_hours (e.g. only on weekends or something like that). If it is not near water .. then how does it match the general perception of 'lifeguard'? Definition of lifeguard - an expert swimmer employed to rescue bathers who get into difficulty at a beach or swimming pool. Where did I ever say something else? The one particular case I quoted, and for which I said lifeguard=place might still apply is “where a shape is visible in some imagery, but not in other” showing an “empty deserted *beach*”. Which pretty clearly implies that it’s near water. I don’t think just because a lifeguard=place isn’t there 24/7, 365 days a year means it isn’t a lifeguard=place. Which is why I said that tags like seasonal (e.g. only in summer) or opening_hours (e.g. only on weekend, only in specific know times, …) might apply.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
