On 26/07/18 20:29, Andrew Davidson wrote:
On 25/07/18 22:05, Robert Szczepanek wrote:
Question 1:
a/ flood_mark
b/ high_water_mark
c/ highwater_mark
A.
High water mark is the level that the water got to, so if you marked
that it would be a high water mark marker....
Question 2:
Which tagging convention should we follow:
a/ flood_mark=yes + historic=memorial + memorial:type=flood_mark
b/ historic=flood_mark + flood_mark:type=(plaque, painted, ...)
c/ historic=highwater_mark
Have you thought about using something like man_made=flood_mark?
Similar to man_made=survey_point
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurvey_point).
Historic suggests that the flood mark is interesting because it is
old. Some flood marks are certainly old and interesting:
http://floodlist.com/dealing-with-floods/flood-high-water-marks#jp-carousel-5861
http://floodlist.com/dealing-with-floods/flood-high-water-marks#jp-carousel-5857
Others are quite new:
http://floodlist.com/dealing-with-floods/flood-high-water-marks#jp-carousel-5865
http://floodlist.com/dealing-with-floods/flood-high-water-marks#jp-carousel-6289
Does it have to be flood_mark:type=*? Would flood_mark=* be adequate?
_______________________________
Some flood marks carry a number of different heights from different
dates. Would be good to map those too.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
