I think it is less verbose. There can be multiple ways to express something in osm, like in the Ruby language ?
djakk Le ven. 3 août 2018 à 16:21, Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> a écrit : > while this might work, why would you try to replace an established > tagging system ? > The tagging system turn:lanes:xxx is supported by several data > consumers (OsmAnd, maps.me, MagicEarth and probably others). > In many countries people worked on tagging all roads with this system > after a project set up by the German community. > > m. > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 4:10 PM djakk djakk <djakk.dj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hello ! > > > > What about a tagging method like this : > > > > lanes=3 > > lane_2=forward_direction;left_turn > > > > or > > > > lanes=3 > > lane_2:direction=forward > > lane_2:turn=left > > > > instead of > > > > lanes=3 > > lanes:forward=2 > > turn:lanes:forward=left|through > > > > ? > > > > > > djakk > > > > > > > > > > > > Le ven. 3 août 2018 à 13:13, Lionel Giard <lionel.gi...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > >> > >> If you look at the wiki page about different lanes tagging ( > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes ), you can see that a suggested > way of tagging (in "Examples/Motorways") is using letter to indicate which > lane goes to where (when there is a transition). This could be used to > extent the width tagging for transition lane (where one lane split to two > (or conversely). There are already a lot of possibility to tag detailed > lanes, but we could indeed add the width in it ! > >> > >> PS: sorry for the previous message, i miss-clicked. > >> > >> 2018-08-03 13:08 GMT+02:00 Lionel Giard <lionel.gi...@gmail.com>: > >>> > >>> If you look at the wiki page about different lanes tagging ( > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes ), you can see that a suggested > w > >>> > >>> 2018-08-02 23:56 GMT+02:00 Tom Hardy <rhardy...@gmail.com>: > >>>> > >>>> I've experimented a bit with lane and road attributes as in > >>>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505256201 and the adjoining > intersection. > >>>> No width, but number, function and placement of lanes. For > placement, I > >>>> always selected the center of the throughway. This allows renderers > that pay > >>>> no attention to lane attributes to render a straight line through an > >>>> intersection. > >>>> > >>>> JOSM's "Enhanced lane and road attributes" visualizer shows this > quite well. > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Tom Hardy <rhardy...@gmail.com> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Tagging mailing list > >>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org > >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >>> > >>> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Tagging mailing list > >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org > >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Tagging mailing list > > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
