On 13 August 2018 at 06:50, Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.kenny+...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 9:48 AM Szem <szembiket...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I begun to use the "permit" tag, what is the correct tagging for these > categories? > > > > - Roads found in Waterworks area (You could get permit only for biking > and walking, no cars except for their own ones) > > access=private, motor_vehicle / vehicle = private ? bicycle=permit, > foot=permit, horse=no > > Sounds right; no need to tag motor_vehicle separately, since 'access' > covers all transportation modes that aren't called out separately. > > > - Roads on the embankments (By any motor vehicle without permission is > forbidden, except for their own ones, other access is free) > > access= private, motor_vehicle / vehicle =permit ? foot=yes, horse=yes, > bicycle=yes, > > If permission is readily obtainable, then 'permit'. If permission > happens on a case-by-case basis, 'private' is probably closer. > In cases when only official vehicles (National Parks, Water supply etc) are allowed, I've always called that vehicles=no, working on " *no* – No access for the general public."? > - Roads managed by Hunting Association, wildlife conservation areas > (Crossing by any vehicle without permission is forbidden, except for their > own ones): > > access= private, motor_vehicle / vehicle = permit, foot=yes, > horse=permit, bicycle= permit > > Once again, if it's "access granted if you comply with the > formalities", then 'permit', otherwise 'private'. The Hunting > Association one sounds as if it restricts access to its own members? > In that case, it's definitely "private." & yes, I'd agree that Members only is "private" Thanks Graeme
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
