On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 2:34 AM, Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.kenny+...@gmail.com> wrote:
I guess where we split is that I tend to tag these odd cases based on > the use that they currently support, and not what they legally are or > may have been. > The only difference is I'd evaluate it on a case-by-case basis until I'd encountered enough of them to formulate a general rule as to when to apply it. All I was attempting here was to point out that access=no is different from access=private and can have valid uses. It's not crazy to have both. It may be rare to have access=no, but any time you see a sign "No vehicles beyond this point" it applies. A pier might well be an example of such: the road it connects to may be accessible to all but don't drive a motor vehicle on the pier itself. -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
