On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 11:14:40PM +0200, François Lacombe wrote: > Le ven. 7 sept. 2018 à 21:40, Richard <ricoz....@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > > > The idea that waterway=* must be routable is, frankly, a new one to > > > me. > > > > that idea is nonsense.. there was never the assertion that > > waterway=ditch,stream > > be navigable. > > > > That escalated quickly ! > Routable doesn't mean navigable at all. Hydrographic routable network is > about where the water goes.
you are right. > We'd really better to separate concepts in different keys between water > ways and other features like dams, fuel places or piers which doesn't carry > water at all. In principle yes, but that is a rather distant target. Richard _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
