for gouvernment i use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=commercial and set office information on point or directly on building set bulding=public
Cheers Le jeu. 20 sept. 2018 à 11:20, egil <e...@riseup.net> a écrit : > In Sweden government agencies are actually not allowed to own the > properties they use. > > Therefore they have long term tenant contracts with required minimum level > of building maintenance, etc. > > These properties are owned by large private real estate giants buying and > selling from each other. > > The owners see the agency as a tenant, nothing more. If the agency moves > the owner finds any other tenant to rent out the space to. > > I tend to agree with Colins arguments below, because in Sweden gov. > agencies are very mixed into the central spaces of cities but often not > clustered together in large complexes or whole areas. > > Cheers > > Egil > On 9/20/18 10:39 AM, Colin Smale wrote: > > Maybe it's just me, but I really can't understand why landuse for > government functions needs its own tagging. The buildings are often > indistinguishable from commercial properties - what is different is that > the occupier is some statutory organisation. We don't tag landuse=charity, > or landuse=private, or landuse=education, so why landuse=civic_admin? If > you want to know who the tenant of a certain building is, let's have > tenant=City of Blah and allow this for any building (or campus). Same > arguments against landuse=religious. Why should farm be tagged as > landuse=religious instead of landuse=farmland just because it is run by > monks? Land use is the use a piece of land is put to, and not WHO is doing > the using or WHY they are doing it. If we want to record those other > dimensions, use different tags instead of further complicating the landuse > mess. > > > > > On 2018-09-20 08:25, Andy Townsend wrote: > > On 20/09/18 03:57, John Willis wrote: > > > ... Retail is always wrong. Commercial is a crutch. > > > In your part of the world, perhaps. Elsewhere, this isn't guaranteed to > be the case. Certainly here in the UK many formerly "civic" services have > been privatised and are run for out-and-out commercial gain; others are run > as commercial entities owned by the government or non-governmental third > sector organisations. What this means is that people will need to pick the > landuse that works best for them in their local area - to say that > something is "always wrong" is, in OSM, almost always wrong(!). > > Best Regards, > > Andy > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing > listTagging@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Cordialement, Jérôme Seigneuret
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
