On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 23:29 +0200, Viking wrote: > > Hi Alberto, > > Nice to see you back there :) > > Regarding check_date, I'd go in favor of operational_status:date. > > working:* is too specific to fully functional hydrants, what about > > disused or dry ones? > > Then operational_status is a more complete solution to give state > > and associated date. > > All the best > > François > > Nice to see you too, Francois :) > Well I proposed working_test:date only because it is already in use > for hydrants. > On the other hand, operational_status is used more often, although > operational_status:date has only 1 occurence. > Shall we go on discussion page [1]? Even Marc preferred operational > status, as reported on [1]. > How would we verify check date, surely that is a record kept by the fire brigade?
Phil (trigpoint) _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
