sent from a phone
> On 17. Dec 2018, at 13:34, Sergio Manzi <s...@smz.it> wrote: > > I added emphasys to part of your quote to underline how I fail to understand > how a "structural detail" cannot be construed as a sub-key of... structure. you should rather have looked at the whole thread, I was replying to this paragraph by the OT: “I'm not convinced soft_storey should be its own key or rather a structural characteristic of a building. For example, building:structure is widely used to tell if buildings are made of masonry, reinforced concrete, etc. It would make sense for soft_storey to be a value of that key. https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/building:structure” Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
