So, to be clear, you are ok with soft_storey being a *sub-key* of building:structure (and hence building:structure:soft_storey=yes/no), but not it being a *value* (building:structure=soft_storey)?
If this is the case... we perfectly agree! :-) Cheers! On 2018-12-17 14:23, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > sent from a phone > > On 17. Dec 2018, at 13:34, Sergio Manzi <s...@smz.it <mailto:s...@smz.it>> > wrote: > >> I added emphasys to part of your quote to underline how I fail to understand >> how a "structural detail" cannot be construed as a sub-key of... structure. > > > you should rather have looked at the whole thread, I was replying to this > paragraph by the OT: “I'm not convinced soft_storey should be its own key or > rather a structural characteristic of a building. For example, > building:structure is widely used to tell if buildings are made of masonry, > reinforced concrete, etc. It would make sense for soft_storey to be a value > of that key. https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/building:structure” > > > Cheers, Martin
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
