I admit that I am putting it on MP, despite that it would be more correct to put in an outer way with some tagging indicating that it refers to this entire forest.
Unfortunately, I have no good idea for tagging it properly. place=locality is rather for small places landuse=logging, landuse=forestry would be also incorrect in nearly all cases natural=forest, natural=wood - well, there is a reason why there is MP here Maybe place=forest would fit well? And in some cases like village or town inside forest second MP would be needed. Jan 23, 2019, 8:55 AM by marc.ge...@gmail.com: > And where do you put the name of the forest/wood ? On the MP or on the > outer way ? > I would think on the outer way, as the scrub is part of the named > area. But then I have an outer way with only a name tag. Is that > correct ? > > m. > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 8:51 AM Warin <> 61sundow...@gmail.com > <mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com>> > wrote: > >> >> On 23/01/19 18:25, Peter Elderson wrote: >> > The rendering itself is a github issue of course, but it shoud be >> > based on consistent tagging, which is a tagging list concern. >> > >> > I slipped up in the contradicting paragraphs... I meant, an area >> > landCOVER=grass within a landUSE=forest. >> > >> > Main point is, let's recognise / support the growing use of the >> > landcover key for the three main values: trees, grass and scrub. Then, >> > bump the issues with the main renderers and editors. How to do that is >> > not for this list, you are absolutely right about that. >> > >> > Only after that step, rediscuss the landuse key. >> >> This developed from a simple question of how to map a tree area that has >> holes in it of scrub etc. >> A fairly simply question? >> >> The simple answer is to map the tree area as a relation with; >> natural=wood (even if not 'natural' as OSM acepts that the key 'natural' >> encompass things that many regard as not 'natural'), type multipolygon, >> The surrounding closed way with the role outer. >> Then place simple closed way/s for the hole/s tagged natural=scrub as >> appropriate .. and then place them in the relation with the role 'inner'. >> >> ------------------------ >> The problem came the simple use of the word forest! >> >> There is no need to wait for other steps to use the tag >> landuse=forestry, it does not conflict with 'landcover' or 'natural' >> tagging. >> Many keys and values are developed in parallel. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging> >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging