+1

N

> On 2 Feb 2019, at 10:39 pm, Markus <selfishseaho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, 2 Feb 2019 at 11:21, Sergio Manzi <s...@smz.it> wrote:
>> 
>> Thank-you for confirming that, Mark.
>> 
>> Personally I think we, in OSM, should stop with this folly of overloading 
>> English words with meanings they do not have in any dictionary (be it AmE, 
>> BrE, CaE, or whatever).
>> 
>> Both the "ditch" and "drain" words can be used to describe certain features 
>> in English. The difference is essentially an etymological one, with one 
>> related to the process of excavation (dig -> ditch) and the other to the 
>> function of carrying liquids away (dry -> drain).
>> 
>> If we want to precisely map certain characteristics of a feature we should 
>> do it explicitly through a correct data model that takes into consideration 
>> the particular aspect we are trying to communicate. We want to communicate 
>> the information that a (small) waterway is lined with concrete? Just say 
>> that with an appropriate tag, like e.g. lined=*, or lining=*. We want to 
>> communicate the information that a (small) waterway is used to carry waste 
>> water away? Once again, let's say that with an appropriate tag, like e.g. 
>> usage=* (please ignore if the specific tags I put in the examples are not of 
>> your liking: not the point here, let's discuss that later...).
>> 
>> Arbitrarily overloading words with meanings they do not have in the common 
>> language is just a perfect way to Babel, that is a reduction in information.
> 
> + 1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to