On Sun, 3 Feb 2019 14:58:42 +1100, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 03/02/19 13:37, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > > > On Sun, 3 Feb 2019 at 12:07, marc marc <marc_marc_...@hotmail.com > > <mailto:marc_marc_...@hotmail.com>> wrote: > > > > I think it would be better to continue the current club=scout > > system and add precision with > > scouts=Scouts|Guiding|Patro|Chiro or any other tag to describe the > > "upstream" organisation/variant. > > > > > > That's a nice neat solution +1 > -1 > I think > club=youth > youth=scout/* is a better approach ... > > > > Naturally though, not all that list of "youth organizations" would > > come under Scouts! > > So put scouts under youth organisations .. logical. I've been re-reading this thread in order to find a solution. It's not clear to me yet how to proceed forward. From what I read, quite some people are not against the usage of club=youth as is. I might just keep using club=youth, although the wiki is against it. On the other hand, what about using club=youth_organization instead of club=youth, to counter the argument that youth is not a special interest group? _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
