On Sat, 2 Feb 2019 13:56:03 +0100, Tom Pfeifer <t.pfei...@computer.org> wrote: > A club, being an association between people, is not a geographical entity.
That's clear, I can agree with that. > Thus I prefer tagging the physical entity, which is the club home, with > amenity=community_centre > where you can specify more closely what it is, e.g. > community_centre=club_home or > community_centre=youth_centre > and specify the target group with > community_centre:for=* > > Adding club=* to describe the intentions of the club even further, the > special interest, is fine, > but I'd not use it alone. club=scout, from the original question, would be > such special interest. Okay, thanks for clearing that up. > Contrary, the age group (senior, youth) is not a special interest in that > sense, compared to the > long list of valid examples on the page. How would you then tag the building and field where Chiro, KSA or Australian Air Force Cadets youth groups gather weekly. club=??? In other words: why does the Scouts movement have it's own club= value? While, in my opinion, scout is not a generic description that covers all. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
