I should have been clearer. I was indicating a case where foot=no would
be appropriate, but I should have stated there are also cases where
'yes' or 'designated' are required. I'm still unsure why Tobias W.
thinks tracks shouldn't be queried at all yet residential roads should.
Don't misunderstand - I'm not advocating the use of the app. I'm dubious
about it's quality if Tobias Z. can spend "3+ years" developing it, yet
not read the wiki. This query should be retitled to something like 'do
pedestrians have legal access to this street?' Hopefully that would
deter users from adding either yes or no when they're unsure which it is
or even if it required at all.
Cheers
DaveF
On 17/02/2019 19:44, Mark Wagner wrote:
Tracks are often "access=private" for everyone, so there's no reason to
call out foot access in particular.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
