As stated previously the sidewalk tag has no legal implication. The
question within the app needs amending to clarify that's it's the
legality of walking along the road that's being queried, not the ease or
dangerousness.
Cheers
DaveF
On 18/02/2019 12:05, Tobias Wrede wrote:
Am 18.02.2019 um 00:48 schrieb Dave F via Tagging:
As already stated, sidewalk is to indicate a physical object.
Sidewalk has no legal implications. 'Foot' is used purely to indicate
legality.
So? I don't think this is disputed.
The reasoning here is that the absence of a sidewalk in some
situations goes along with a foot=no signage. Think of a
motorized-traffic only overpass. So now if StreetComplete finds a
situation with sidewalk=no and no foot=* tagged it merely asks if that
is a situation where the original mapper forgot to put the access=no
on the road or not.
Tobias
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
