I meant “road for hgv” not “road for hybrid” ^^ Julien “djakk”
Le lun. 25 févr. 2019 à 11:35, djakk djakk <djakk.dj...@gmail.com> a écrit : > I forgot to mention that there are several kind of road to class : > footway, cycleway, road for cars, road for hybrid, road for psv ;) > > Julien “djakk” > > > Le lun. 25 févr. 2019 à 10:55, Erkin Alp Güney <erkinalp9...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > >> Service roads would be highway=service as it is now. >> >> road_level tag also solves non-primary motorway tagging (motorroad, >> autovia, non-expressway freeway, Polish S-road, Russian limited access >> A-road etc.). You would tag a non-primary motorway as highway=motorway >> road_level=<nonzero>. >> >> 25.02.2019 00:20 tarihinde Graeme Fitzpatrick yazdı: >> > >> > >> > On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 00:27, djakk djakk <djakk.dj...@gmail.com >> > <mailto:djakk.dj...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> > >> > Hello ! >> > >> > I think we should decorrelate the attributes of a road : its >> > administrative class, its importance in the road network (at least >> > 5 levels), its physical characteristics (motorway-like, two large >> > lanes, link=yes ...), possibly its traffic characteristics. >> > >> > So we can tag a secondary motorway or a primary road through a >> > residential area or an official motorway with pedestrians actually >> > walking on it. >> > >> > So that we’ll unify osm road classification through the world >> > (remember the highway=trunk issue ;-)) >> > >> > >> > I could see that working! >> > >> > Replace the existing highway= types (=motorway; =primary etc) with >> > highway=1 to =5?, with 1 being the existing =motorway, down to 5 being >> > all the minor streets in a town. >> > >> > If you have a look >> > at https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/-28.0643/153.4191 (& I'm >> > pretty sure everywhere around the World will look fairly similar?), >> > the pink Pacific Motorway (=motorway) would become =1; the orange / >> > tan major arterial roads (=primary: 2; 3; 7; 40; 50) =2; yellow >> > connecting roads (=secondary) =3; white roads through suburbs >> > (=tertiary) =4; all the grey minor roads (=residential / >> > unclassified): residential in the suburbs, commercial areas in the >> > CBD, roads inside industrial areas etc =5. >> > >> > Would you need =6 for service roads (driveways, parking lanes etc), or >> > would they stay as the current=service designation? >> > >> > Setting levels like this & rendering them this way, would also get rid >> > of the problem of roads not being visible in remote areas because a >> > "secondary" road won't render - even if it's only hard-packed dirt, it >> > would still be the level 1 or 2 road in this area! >> > >> > Feasible? >> > >> > Thanks >> > >> > Graeme >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
