Taginfo shows it is not the preferred method 979<3562
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/cycleway%3Aleft%3Aoneway=-1
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/cycleway%3Aleft=opposite_lane
*=opposite_lane is/was well understood as far as I know (I am regularly
"teaching" OSM using the bicycle wiki page as reference).
Why using two tags when one works well, when the value opposite_lane
exists and the interpretation is the same?
I can understand the more structured aspect but using the :oneway value
not to traduce the oneway but its direction is not clean for me. Why not
using something with backward and forward in this case?
Just my opinion but if "cycleway:left:oneway=-1" is officially preferred
I will use it and promote it.
Charles
On 15/03/2019 01:35, Hubert87 wrote:
I also regard
"cycleway:left=lane"
"cycleway:left:oneway=-1"
as the currently preferred method and have been mapping/tagging like
this for a while now.
Just my two cents
Hubert87
Am 15.03.2019 um 00:12 schrieb althio:
Discussed: maybe there
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-May/036164.html
Decided : I don't know
Cmuelle introduces rather complex combinations of tags such as
cycleway:left=lane + cycleway:left:oneway=-1, that should in his
view be used instead of cycleway:left=opposite_lane. Does anyone on
this list know whether this change has been discussed anywhere, and
where and when it has been decided that cycleway=opposite_lane is a
"legacy tag" ? If so please point me at some references.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
