Suggesting forward and backward as tag values is a rather bad thing, as these are values for route relation roles.
For example, if a physical way as part of a route relation is travelled along the direction of the osm way (as given by its node order) it may be assigned the role "forward" and this would then have nothing or little to do with legal restrictions on the physical way. And how exactly would *:direction=forward be beneficial to *:oneway=1 if both aim to describe legal precepts on travel direction for a physical way? I've seen a lot of people suggesting :direction over :oneway now, but don't see why in that context. Regards, cmuelle8 > On 03/19/19, 08:23, Markus wrote: > > Those exceptions could be tagged > cycleway:[left|right]:direction=[forward|backward|both]. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
