Hi, a. If the object of the research is just to map deforestation, you only need to map trees. You also need 100% coverage of all tree areas. You do not need to map "no landcover".
b. If the object is to map deforestation AND what replaces the trees, you need to map the replacing landcovers as well, and you need 100% coverage of those. If there is a landcover other than trees but no detail, a general landcover is needed. If it is done like that, you do not need to map "no landcover". The secondo is more our idea. I never said that we want to map “no landcover”. c. If I did a project like this, I would want to map 100% of the target area, to make sure all areas have been processed. In that case I would want to map "no landcover" as opposed to "not mapped yet". Alternatively, I would mark areas with a separate tag as "not yet included in the project". d. In all cases, other mappers can and will alter the tagging if and when they see fit. There is no problem if people modify and improve our classification with a survey, is the best advantages to be a community. Vr gr Peter Elderson Op wo 20 mrt. 2019 om 09:26 schreef Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com<mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com>>: On 20/03/19 18:54, Lorenzo Stucchi wrote: > Hi Giovanni, > > We thinks that it also important understand if the area is without vegetation > because becomes a cultivated land, an artificial area or the trees are just > cutted for wood and so some year after they will appear again. For this > reason we thinks that is interesting to understand also what there is in the > are without trees. > An area without trees will not have a tag for trees. An area that is not mapped will look like there are no trees. Map the trees and you then know both the area of trees and the area without trees. You do not need a special tag to say there are no trees. PS the OSM key 'natural' applies to both 'natural' and 'unnatural' areas! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:natural key 'natural' OSM definition: "Used to describe natural physical land features, including ones that have been modified by humans." _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org<mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org<mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
