I'm made some minor updates to the proposal page in response to comments here and one on the talk page.
1) More than 1 tent allowed: A camp pitch can sometimes allow more than one tent. Often a family can have separate tents for parents and kids, and there are also "group site" which are reserved for a single party and have a single reference number, but can hold dozens of people 2) I added comments about the reasons for going with camp-site=camp_pitch instead of tourism=* a) - Using the tourism key would make it not possible to tag a tourism=camp_site and camp_site=camp_pitch on a single node, in the case of very small campsites that only have one pitch. b) - More importantly, it is thought that using a standard key like "tourism" might imply that this is a stand-alone feature; it might be used instead of tourism=camp_site rather than inside of a tourism=camp_site area. c) Most importantly, camp_site=camp_pitch is currently in use and extensive retagging would be required to change the tag or key. Martin, I don't understand this comment: On 4/18/19, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > And you may eventually be able to keep the exact same tagging but with > different intended semantics (and basically the same meaning for the people > who use the map): camp_pitch as subtype of camp site, not as a pitch object > like tourism=camp_pitch What do you mean by "camp_pitch as a subtype of camp site"? Are you proposing something like this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Key:camp_pitch Joseph _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
