On Sunday 28 April 2019, Christoph Hormann wrote: > [...] > > Seriously? > > Because one polygon is not a verifiable representation of a certain > feature you want to replace it with - drumroll - two polygons?
I am sorry if that came across more dismissive than necessary - i was just quite taken aback by the suggestion which from my perspective pretty much flies into the face of the idea of verifiability. But i understand the underlying thought process and see that it is not trivial at all why this makes very little sense and goes in the opposite direction of what might make sense. And entertaining the idea for a moment and considering why you might think this helps but why it ultimately does not is a useful approach. -- Christoph Hormann http://www.imagico.de/ _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
