> It's not mapping the entire range as such, but would is_in work here? > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:is%20in?uselang=en-AU
> natural=mountain_range > name=Main Range > is_in=Great Dividing Range Yes, that makes sense to me On 4/29/19, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 at 08:09, Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Yes, make 2 separate ways. >> > > Thanks! > > >> I think it’s reasonable to map a mountain range as a linear way when this >> can follow a continuous series of ridge crests. But a mountain range that >> is split in 2 by a valley should be considered 2 local features that >> share >> a name. >> > > Yep, makes sense. > > >> For this reason, large and complex mountains ranges, like the Rocky >> Mountains, cannot be mapped as a single linear or area feature: they >> consist of many smaller ranges which spread over a wide area, with vague >> boundaries. >> > > It's not mapping the entire range as such, but would is_in work here? > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:is%20in?uselang=en-AU > > natural=mountain_range > name=Main Range > is_in=Great Dividing Range > > Thoughts? > > Thanks > > Graeme > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
