On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 5:47 PM Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 28. Jul 2019, at 22:23, Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.ke...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > But this doesn't really address the problem. We can't fix State Parks > > by making them 'boundary=national_park admin_level=4' because they > > don't function as 'national park' in the IUCN deffinition of the term. > > > the proposal was boundary=protected_area > admin_level=4 > you could also add a protection title.
Right. And the original proposal was to activate a protect_class=* that was previously dormant, because nothing of 1a-6 fits the situation. Many of these parks simply aren't created to conserve nature, they're created to provide opportunities for a variety of outdoor recreations. admin_level isn't *wrong*, it just doesn't help. With or without admin_level, there's no IUCN-defined protect_class that fits. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
