Jul 30, 2019, 9:54 AM by dieterdre...@gmail.com: > > > Am Di., 30. Juli 2019 um 00:51 Uhr schrieb Joseph Eisenberg <> > joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com <mailto:joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com>> >: > >> -1 to a site relation for an area with a defined outer boundary. >> > > >> >> Relation = boundary (and =multipolygon) works fine for defining an area, and >> you can make holes to exclude at my “outparcels” or villages which are not >> part of the official protected area. >> > > > > the difference is that in case a thing which is either outer or inner member > of a boundary or multipolygon changes, you will not know whether the MP has > to change or you have to duplicate the old border for the multipolygon > because it should remain. In a site relation it is clearer that the > modification of a member should likely have immediate effect on the relation > as well. > Can you give more specific exampleof edit where site relation is better? Things that are areas should be taggedas areas. So multipolygon seems preferable to me.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
