On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 04:09, Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 at 18:48, Bob Kerr via Tagging < > tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > > I did consider using the toilet tag, unfortunately there is no toilet and >> it would give the area a feeling of respectability. If it is piled high >> with plastic bags, assorted rubbish and human piss and shit then it is more >> a sign that they need a toilet. It would definitely need a different >> symbol. I was thinking of a squatting man symbol >> > > True. I'd hate to go to what the map led me to believe was a public > toilet and find it was > actually one of these things. >
"Slightly" tongue in cheek, but render the area in a light - mid brown colour, with a regular pattern of https://www.flaticon.com/free-icons/poop icons across it (similar to dog-parks, forested areas & so on) ? :-) > >> Maybe “landuse=open_defecation_area” would be more appropriate but that >> may interfere with other land use tags. >> > > Not really a problem. Turn the existing landuse=whatever into the outer > of a multipolygon > and add landuse=open_defecation_area as an inner of the multipolygon. > It's not that hard > to do, especially as iD has made it a lot easier to cut and paste tags > between objects. > Would it need a multipolygon? My impression of the ODA is an open patch of ground in / beside a residential area. If that is the case, wouldn't it be much simpler to just mark a new area in as landuse=o_d_a? (accept it wouldn't be abbreviated) Thanks Graeme
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging